September 30, 2026 2:55 pm

Karnataka Challenges Western Ghats ESA Demarcation

CURRENT AFFAIRS: Western Ghats, Kasturirangan Committee, Ecologically Sensitive Area, Karnataka, Gadgil Committee, ESA Notification, Satellite Mapping, Physical Survey, Biodiversity, Environmental Protection

Karnataka Challenges Western Ghats ESA Demarcation

Karnataka Rejects Kasturirangan Recommendations

Karnataka Challenges Western Ghats ESA Demarcation: The Karnataka Legislature has unanimously opposed the K. Kasturirangan Committee recommendations on declaring parts of the Western Ghats as an Ecologically Sensitive Area (ESA) in their present form.

The resolution follows the seventh draft notification, issued in July 2026 by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. States were given 60 days to submit objections and suggestions regarding the proposed ESA boundaries.

Karnataka has rejected the proposal repeatedly since the first draft was issued in 2014. The state recognises the ecological importance of the Western Ghats but has raised concerns about the possible effects of ESA restrictions on agriculture, plantations, settlements and livelihoods.

Kasturirangan Committee and Western Ghats

The High Level Working Group (HLWG) was headed by space scientist K. Kasturirangan and was constituted in 2012 to review the recommendations of the earlier Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP) chaired by Madhav Gadgil.

The Gadgil Committee submitted its report in 2011, while the Kasturirangan-led group submitted its recommendations in 2013. The Western Ghats are recognised by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site because of their exceptional biodiversity.

Static GK fact: The Western Ghats extend along India’s western side through Gujarat, Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu and are one of the world’s major biodiversity hotspots.

ESA Area Under Consideration

The Western Ghats cover approximately 1.64 lakh sq. km. The Kasturirangan Committee originally recommended about 59,940 sq. km, covering 4,156 villages across six states, for ESA designation.

The committee’s approach focused on biologically rich natural landscapes, which represented around 41% of the Western Ghats, with approximately 37% identified as relatively less fragmented and ecologically significant.

The area proposed in the latest process has reduced to around 56,825 sq. km. Kerala’s physical verification reduced its proposed ESA area to 9,993 sq. km, while changes have also occurred in village coverage across Maharashtra, Goa and Karnataka.

Restrictions Proposed Under ESA

The recommendations distinguish between activities that would be prohibited and those that could continue subject to regulation.

Mining, quarrying and sand extraction, red-category industries, thermal power projects and certain large construction activities would face prohibition. Township and area-development projects are also proposed to be restricted.

Infrastructure and development projects may continue subject to environmental clearance. Hydroelectric projects could also be permitted under specified conditions, while projects within 10 km of the ESA may require scrutiny under the EIA Notification, 2006.

The framework also proposes Green Growth incentives and a decision-support and monitoring mechanism for the Western Ghats.

Karnataka’s Major Objections

Karnataka has argued that ESA boundaries should primarily cover forest areas, rather than plantations, agricultural and horticultural land or residential and public areas.

The state has also questioned the reliance on satellite-based mapping without a comprehensive joint physical survey. It has highlighted difficulties in distinguishing revenue land from forest land and raised concerns about Bagair Hukum claims, forest rights, deemed forests, land grants and pending legal cases.

Another objection concerns village-level demarcation. Karnataka has opposed including an entire village merely because a portion of its area meets the proposed forest-related criterion.

Karnataka Seeks Ground Verification

The state has sought approximately one year to conduct a detailed physical survey before its ESA boundaries are finalised.

The Karnataka Legislature has also proposed a high-level committee headed by a retired judge, with stakeholder participation, to examine the recommendations and suggest modifications.

Static GK Tip: The Gadgil approach was broader and more stringent, while the Kasturirangan approach used a more focused natural-landscape methodology. The continuing debate reflects the challenge of balancing biodiversity conservation with local development and livelihood concerns.

Static Usthadian Current Affairs Table

Karnataka Challenges Western Ghats ESA Demarcation:

Fact Detail
Main Issue Western Ghats Ecologically Sensitive Area
Kasturirangan Committee High Level Working Group constituted in 2012
Kasturirangan Report Submitted in 2013
Gadgil Committee WGEEP report submitted in 2011
Original ESA Proposal About 59,940 sq. km
Latest Proposed Area About 56,825 sq. km
Western Ghats States Gujarat, Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu
Karnataka Demand Physical survey before final demarcation
Major Concerns Land classification, livelihoods and satellite-based mapping
Key Environmental Law Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
Karnataka Challenges Western Ghats ESA Demarcation
  1. The Karnataka Legislature has unanimously opposed the Kasturirangan Committee recommendations on Western Ghats Ecologically Sensitive Area (ESA) demarcation in their present form.
  2. The latest seventh draft ESA notification was issued in July 2026 by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC).
  3. The July 2026 draft provides states with 60 days to submit objections and suggestions on the proposed ESA boundaries.
  4. Karnataka has repeatedly opposed the proposed Western Ghats ESA framework since the first draft notification in 2014.
  5. The High Level Working Group (HLWG) headed by Kasturirangan was constituted in 2012 to review the earlier Gadgil Committee recommendations.
  6. The Madhav Gadgil-led Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP) submitted its report in 2011, while the Kasturirangan Committee submitted its recommendations in 2013.
  7. The Western Ghats are recognised by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site because of their exceptional biodiversity.
  8. The Western Ghats extend through Gujarat, Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu along India’s western side.
  9. The Western Ghats cover approximately 64 lakh sq. km, making the scale of ESA demarcation a major geographical and policy issue.
  10. The original Kasturirangan proposal identified about 59,940 sq. km across 4,156 villages in six states for ESA designation.
  11. The latest ESA area under consideration has reduced to approximately 56,825 sq. km, reflecting changes in boundary and village-level assessments.
  12. Kerala’s physical verification reduced its proposed ESA area to approximately 9,993 sq. km, while boundary changes have also occurred in other states.
  13. The Kasturirangan approach focused primarily on relatively less fragmented, biologically rich natural landscapes, while the Gadgil approach was broader and more stringent.
  14. Proposed prohibited activities under the ESA framework include mining, quarrying, sand extraction, red-category industries and thermal power projects.
  15. Certain large construction projects and township and area-development projects are also proposed to face restrictions within the ESA framework.
  16. Proposed regulated activities may include infrastructure and development projects subject to environmental clearance and applicable conditions.
  17. Hydroelectric projects may be permitted under specified conditions, while projects within 10 km of the ESA may require scrutiny under the EIA Notification, 2006.
  18. Karnataka has argued that ESA boundaries should primarily cover forest areas, rather than plantations, agricultural and horticultural land or residential and public areas.
  19. Karnataka has questioned exclusive reliance on satellite-based mapping and has sought a comprehensive joint physical survey, including examination of forest rights, deemed forests, land grants and Bagair Hukum claims.
  20. Karnataka has sought approximately one year for physical verification and proposed a high-level committee headed by a retired judge to examine the ESA recommendations before final demarcation.

Q1. Which committee was constituted in 2012 to review the recommendations of the Gadgil Committee on the Western Ghats?


Q2. What was the approximate area originally recommended by the Kasturirangan Committee for declaration as an Ecologically Sensitive Area in the Western Ghats?


Q3. Which of the following activities is proposed to be prohibited under the Western Ghats ESA framework?


Q4. What is Karnataka seeking before finalisation of the Western Ghats ESA boundaries?


Q5. Which statement correctly distinguishes the Gadgil and Kasturirangan approaches to the Western Ghats?


Your Score: 0

News of the Day

Premium

National Tribal Health Conclave 2025: Advancing Inclusive Healthcare for Tribal India
New Client Special Offer

20% Off

Aenean leo ligulaconsequat vitae, eleifend acer neque sed ipsum. Nam quam nunc, blandit vel, tempus.