April 19, 2026 2:25 pm

Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Grant Divorce

CURRENT AFFAIRS: Article 142, Supreme Court of India, Mutual consent divorce, Mediation settlement, domestic violence case, legal misuse, matrimonial disputes, complete justice, judicial powers

Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Grant Divorce

Landmark judicial intervention

Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Grant Divorce: The Supreme Court of India delivered a significant ruling by dissolving a marriage using its extraordinary powers under Article 142. This provision allows the Court to ensure complete justice in cases where existing laws may fall short.

The case highlighted the misuse of legal mechanisms in matrimonial disputes. The Court intervened to prevent further abuse of judicial processes and to uphold fairness between the parties.

Static GK fact: Article 142 is part of Part V of the Indian Constitution, dealing with the Union judiciary.

Background of the dispute

The couple had agreed to a mutual consent divorce through mediation. As part of the settlement, the husband paid Rs 75 lakh, an additional Rs 14 lakh for a car, and returned jewellery mentioned in the agreement.

However, after receiving these benefits, the wife withdrew her consent. She later filed a domestic violence case against the husband and his family members, complicating the legal proceedings.

Static GK Tip: Mutual consent divorce in India is governed under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Court observations on allegations

The wife alleged that jewellery worth Rs 120 crore and gold biscuits worth Rs 50 crore were not returned. She claimed these were intentionally excluded from the agreement.

The Court rejected these claims due to lack of evidence. It noted that such allegations were neither included in the settlement nor reflected in any communication between the parties.

The bench described her conduct as “highly egregious” and criticised the misuse of legal provisions. It emphasized that courts cannot allow manipulation of judicial processes.

Significance of Article 142 powers

The Court reiterated that mediation settlements approved by courts are binding and must be respected. Allowing arbitrary withdrawal would weaken alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.

By invoking Article 142, the Court ensured final resolution by dissolving the marriage and preventing prolonged litigation. This power is used sparingly and only in exceptional circumstances.

Static GK fact: Article 142 enables the Supreme Court to pass any decree necessary to do complete justice in any matter before it.

Final verdict and implications

The Supreme Court dissolved the marriage and quashed all pending civil and criminal cases between the parties. It directed the husband to pay the remaining Rs 70 lakh as final settlement.

This judgment reinforces the sanctity of mediation and sends a strong message against misuse of legal remedies. It also strengthens trust in the judiciary’s ability to deliver equitable outcomes.

Static GK Tip: The Supreme Court of India was established in 1950 and is the highest judicial authority in the country.

Static Usthadian Current Affairs Table

Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Grant Divorce:

Topic Detail
Case Divorce granted using Article 142 powers
Key Provision Article 142 of Indian Constitution
Issue Withdrawal from mediation settlement and legal misuse
Court Observation Allegations lacked evidence and were egregious
Legal Principle Mediation settlements are binding
Action Taken Marriage dissolved and cases quashed
Financial Direction Remaining Rs 70 lakh to be paid
Significance Reinforces judicial authority and fairness
Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Grant Divorce
  1. Supreme Court of India invoked Article 142 for divorce.
  2. Article 142 ensures complete justice in exceptional legal cases.
  3. Case involved misuse of legal provisions in matrimonial disputes.
  4. Court intervened to prevent abuse of judicial processes effectively.
  5. Article 142 is part of Part V of Constitution.
  6. Couple initially agreed to mutual consent divorce through mediation.
  7. Husband paid settlement including money, car, and jewellery.
  8. Wife later withdrew consent and filed domestic violence case.
  9. Court rejected allegations due to lack of supporting evidence.
  10. Claims were not included in mediation settlement agreement earlier.
  11. Court termed conduct as highly egregious misuse of law.
  12. Emphasized that mediation settlements are legally binding agreements.
  13. Withdrawal weakens effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution systems.
  14. Court dissolved marriage using extraordinary constitutional powers.
  15. All pending civil and criminal cases were quashed.
  16. Directed husband to pay remaining ₹70 lakh settlement amount.
  17. Reinforces sanctity of mediation and negotiated legal settlements.
  18. Prevents prolonged litigation and ensures timely justice delivery.
  19. Supreme Court established in 1950 as highest judicial authority.
  20. Judgment strengthens trust in judiciary’s fairness and accountability mechanisms.

Q1. Which Article empowers the Supreme Court to ensure complete justice?


Q2. What type of divorce was initially agreed upon by the couple?


Q3. Under which law is mutual consent divorce governed in India?


Q4. What was the court’s observation regarding the wife’s allegations?


Q5. What final action did the Supreme Court take?


Your Score: 0

Current Affairs PDF April 17

Descriptive CA PDF

One-Liner CA PDF

MCQ CA PDF​

CA PDF Tamil

Descriptive CA PDF Tamil

One-Liner CA PDF Tamil

MCQ CA PDF Tamil

CA PDF Hindi

Descriptive CA PDF Hindi

One-Liner CA PDF Hindi

MCQ CA PDF Hindi

News of the Day

Premium

National Tribal Health Conclave 2025: Advancing Inclusive Healthcare for Tribal India
New Client Special Offer

20% Off

Aenean leo ligulaconsequat vitae, eleifend acer neque sed ipsum. Nam quam nunc, blandit vel, tempus.