Background of the Framework
National Technology Readiness Assessment Framework: The Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India unveiled the Draft National Technology Readiness Assessment Framework (NTRAF) to bring uniformity in how innovation readiness is assessed across India.
The framework addresses a long-standing gap in evaluating the maturity of technologies before public funding or private investment.
India has multiple National Missions supporting innovation, but assessment methods have often differed across departments.
NTRAF seeks to establish a common national benchmark for judging technological progress.
Purpose and Core Objective
The primary aim of NTRAF is to serve as the operational backbone for R&D funding mechanisms under various national missions.
It enables funding agencies to allocate public resources more precisely and objectively.
By standardising assessment, the framework reduces uncertainty around early-stage technologies.
This helps in de-risking innovations, making them more attractive for private sector participation.
Static GK fact: India adopted Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) originally conceptualised by NASA to assess technology maturity.
Structured Technology Readiness Levels
NTRAF provides a clear, stage-wise methodology to evaluate technologies across their development lifecycle.
It categorises progress using TRL 1 to TRL 9, ensuring consistency in evaluation.
- TRL 1–3 focus on Proof of Concept, where basic principles and feasibility are validated.
- TRL 4–6 cover Prototype Development, involving lab-scale and pilot demonstrations.
- TRL 7–9 represent Market and Operational Readiness, where technologies are field-tested and commercialised.
This structured progression removes ambiguity in assessing innovation maturity.
Evidence-Based Assessment Approach
A key feature of NTRAF is its shift from subjective judgment to an evidence-based checklist system.
Each TRL stage is supported by verifiable technical, financial, and operational indicators.
This replaces earlier qualitative estimations that often varied across evaluators.
As a result, assessment outcomes become transparent, replicable, and defensible.
Static GK Tip: Evidence-based frameworks are widely used in OECD countries to improve public R&D efficiency.
Empowering Project Investigators
NTRAF empowers Project Investigators and innovators to accurately assess their current position.
It allows them to identify technical gaps, scalability challenges, and validation needs before applying for funding.
This self-assessment capability improves proposal quality and reduces rejection rates.
It also promotes realistic expectation-setting among innovators.
Impact on R&D Funding and Industry
For funding agencies, NTRAF improves decision-making efficiency and outcome tracking.
Resources can be channelled toward projects that demonstrate genuine readiness for the next stage.
For industry, the framework lowers investment risk, especially in deep-tech and emerging sectors.
This strengthens collaboration between government, academia, and private enterprises.
Static GK fact: India aims to raise Gross Expenditure on R&D (GERD) to over 2% of GDP in the long term.
Strategic Importance for India
NTRAF aligns with India’s push for self-reliance in critical technologies and innovation-led growth.
It supports national priorities in areas such as defence, space, clean energy, health, and digital technologies.
By institutionalising readiness assessment, India moves closer to a mission-mode innovation ecosystem.
Static Usthadian Current Affairs Table
National Technology Readiness Assessment Framework:
| Topic | Detail |
| Framework Name | National Technology Readiness Assessment Framework |
| Released By | Principal Scientific Adviser to Government of India |
| Core Objective | Standardise technology maturity assessment |
| Assessment Model | Technology Readiness Levels (TRL 1–9) |
| Early Stage | Proof of Concept (TRL 1–3) |
| Mid Stage | Prototype Development (TRL 4–6) |
| Final Stage | Market and Operational Readiness (TRL 7–9) |
| Key Benefit | Evidence-based, uniform funding decisions |
| Strategic Impact | De-risking innovation and boosting private investment |





