October 15, 2025 5:13 am

Kerala’s Proposal to Change Wildlife Protection Law

CURRENT AFFAIRS: Kerala Wildlife Law 2025, Wildlife Protection Act 1972 Amendment, Human Wildlife Conflict Kerala, Wild Boar Culling Kerala, Section 62 Wildlife Act, Bonnet Macaque Schedule Change, Wildlife Deaths Kerala, Forest Policy India 2025

Kerala’s Proposal to Change Wildlife Protection Law

Rising animal attacks

Kerala’s Proposal to Change Wildlife Protection Law: Kerala has officially requested the Union government to amend the Wildlife Protection Act of 1972. The main goal is to allow the culling of wild animals that are a direct threat to people and property. This move comes in response to a steep increase in human-wildlife conflict cases.

From 2016 to early 2025, around 919 people died and nearly 9,000 were injured due to encounters with wild animals. Among Kerala’s 941 village local bodies, 273 have been marked as conflict hotspots. Dangerous animals involved include tigers, leopards, elephants, and wild boars.

What is driving the conflict?

There are several reasons for the increasing human-animal encounters. First, habitat loss and degradation have pushed animals closer to human areas. Forest fragmentation has forced wildlife to search for food outside their natural habitats.

Second, grazing by domestic animals inside forest zones has disturbed the ecosystem. On top of that, shifting agricultural patterns have created an easy food source for wild animals like wild boars and monkeys. These animals damage crops, leading to both economic loss and fear among farmers.

The sharp increase in the wild boar and monkey populations has been particularly challenging. Monkeys, especially the bonnet macaque, often invade homes and farmlands, causing regular disturbance.

Why Kerala wants legal changes?

Currently, the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 makes it difficult to take urgent steps. For any culling to be approved, the chief wildlife warden must prove that an animal cannot be captured or relocated. This process is time-consuming and can delay important action in emergencies.

Kerala now wants to temporarily list wild boars as vermin under Section 62 of the Act. This would make it easier to manage their population. The state also wants to remove the bonnet macaque from Schedule I, so that better control measures can be taken without legal delays.

Issues in managing wild animals

The process of wildlife management remains complicated. Court orders often prevent local officials from taking swift decisions during animal attacks. Even basic steps, like checking if a wild boar is pregnant before culling, make the rules hard to implement.

The Kerala government believes that more flexible legal tools are needed. Without quick permissions, people in rural areas continue to face danger, while farms suffer losses.

Static Usthadian Current Affairs Table

Kerala’s Proposal to Change Wildlife Protection Law:

Topic Details
Wildlife Protection Act Enacted in 1972, governs wildlife in India
Section 62 of the Act Allows temporary declaration of vermin
Bonnet Macaque Currently under Schedule I protection
State with highest HWC deaths Kerala (as per recent government data)
Number of conflict hotspots 273 out of 941 local bodies in Kerala
Key animals in conflicts Tigers, leopards, elephants, wild boars
Related central body Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change
Kerala’s Proposal to Change Wildlife Protection Law
  1. Kerala has requested an amendment to the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 due to rising animal attacks.
  2. From 2016 to early 2025, 919 people died and 9,000 were injured in wildlife conflicts in Kerala.
  3. 273 out of 941 village local bodies in Kerala are marked as conflict hotspots.
  4. Key conflict animals include tigers, leopards, elephants, and wild boars.
  5. Habitat loss and forest fragmentation are primary causes of increased human-wildlife encounters.
  6. Grazing by domestic animals disrupts forest ecosystems, worsening wildlife movement.
  7. Shifting agricultural patterns attract animals like wild boars and monkeys to farms.
  8. The population of wild boars and bonnet macaques has risen sharply, increasing damage.
  9. Bonnet macaques regularly invade homes and farmlands, becoming a frequent nuisance.
  10. Current laws require proof that relocation isn’t possible before permitting culling.
  11. Kerala wants wild boars declared vermin under Section 62 of the Act.
  12. The state also proposes removing the bonnet macaque from Schedule I for easier control.
  13. Legal delays often hinder urgent action during wildlife emergencies.
  14. Local officials face judicial restrictions in culling decisions.
  15. Wildlife rules require even checking pregnancy status before culling, complicating operations.
  16. Kerala argues for more flexible legal tools to manage urgent wildlife threats.
  17. Farmers suffer economic losses due to repeated crop destruction by wild animals.
  18. Rural populations face danger without timely action against aggressive wildlife.
  19. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change oversees wildlife policy in India.
  20. Kerala records the highest number of wildlife-related deaths in the country, as per recent data.

Q1. What is the primary reason behind Kerala’s proposal to amend the Wildlife Protection Act of 1972?


Q2. Which section of the Wildlife Protection Act allows temporary declaration of animals as vermin?


Q3. Which animal does Kerala propose to remove from Schedule I protection?


Q4. How many people died due to wildlife encounters in Kerala between 2016 and early 2025?


Q5. Which ministry is responsible for overseeing wildlife laws in India?


Your Score: 0

Current Affairs PDF October 14

Descriptive CA PDF

One-Liner CA PDF

MCQ CA PDF​

CA PDF Tamil

Descriptive CA PDF Tamil

One-Liner CA PDF Tamil

MCQ CA PDF Tamil

CA PDF Hindi

Descriptive CA PDF Hindi

One-Liner CA PDF Hindi

MCQ CA PDF Hindi

News of the Day

Premium

National Tribal Health Conclave 2025: Advancing Inclusive Healthcare for Tribal India
New Client Special Offer

20% Off

Aenean leo ligulaconsequat vitae, eleifend acer neque sed ipsum. Nam quam nunc, blandit vel, tempus.