March 10, 2026 4:13 pm

Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctuary Expansion Ordered by Karnataka High Court

CURRENT AFFAIRS: Karnataka High Court, Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctuary, Wildlife Protection Act 1972, Eco-Sensitive Zone, Gadag district, Karnataka State Wildlife Board, reserve forest, biodiversity conservation, protected areas

Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctuary Expansion Ordered by Karnataka High Court

Court Directive on Sanctuary Boundary

Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctuary Expansion Ordered by Karnataka High Court: The Karnataka High Court directed the State government to include the remaining portions of the Kappatagudda Reserve Forest within the officially notified Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctuary located in Gadag district. The directive was issued after the court found discrepancies between the area approved for protection and the area declared in the government notification.

A Division Bench led by Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha noted that the sanctuary notification issued on 16 May 2019 covered only 244.15 square kilometres. However, the Karnataka State Wildlife Board (KSWB) had earlier recommended protecting a significantly larger area.

Discrepancy in the Protected Area

During a meeting held on 9 January 2019, the KSWB, chaired by the Chief Minister of Karnataka, had resolved to declare the entire Kappatagudda Reserve Forest as a wildlife sanctuary. The board initially estimated the forest area to be around 300 square kilometres.

Later examination revealed that the actual forest area measures about 288 square kilometres. The High Court observed that reducing the sanctuary size to 244.15 square kilometres without proper justification was arbitrary and inconsistent with the board’s recommendation.

Static GK fact: India currently has over 570 wildlife sanctuaries, forming a crucial part of the country’s protected area network for biodiversity conservation.

Stone Crushing Petitions Dismissed

The court delivered the ruling while dismissing petitions filed by Shivaganga Stone Crushing Industries and other operators running stone-crushing units near the fourth block of the reserve forest. These units were located on patta lands close to the sanctuary’s boundaries.

The petitioners argued that the declaration of the sanctuary and the surrounding Eco-Sensitive Zone (ESZ) restricted their industrial operations. They requested that the sanctuary boundary be limited to 178 square kilometres, as proposed in an earlier 2017 plan.

The High Court rejected the petitions, stating that environmental protection and biodiversity conservation must take precedence over commercial interests.

Direction to Issue a Fresh Notification

After reviewing the records, the court noted that the government could not produce any official explanation for reducing the sanctuary area. As a result, the bench ordered the State government to issue a fresh notification.

The revised notification must include the remaining 55 square kilometres of the reserve forest that had been excluded earlier. This will ensure that the sanctuary boundaries align with the recommendation made by the Karnataka State Wildlife Board.

Static GK Tip: The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 is the primary legislation governing wildlife conservation in India and provides legal provisions for the declaration of National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuaries, and Conservation Reserves.

Importance of Eco-Sensitive Zones

The case also highlighted the role of Eco-Sensitive Zones (ESZs) surrounding protected areas. These zones function as buffer regions where certain activities such as mining, stone crushing, and large-scale industrial operations are regulated.

The objective of ESZs is to reduce human pressure on protected ecosystems while allowing limited sustainable activities. Such regulatory zones play an important role in protecting wildlife habitats in fragile landscapes like the Deccan plateau region of Karnataka.

The High Court also clarified that the State government retains the authority to modify sanctuary boundaries in the future, but only by following the procedures established under environmental laws and wildlife protection rules.

Static Usthadian Current Affairs Table

Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctuary Expansion Ordered by Karnataka High Court:

Topic Detail
Event Karnataka High Court ordered expansion of Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctuary
Location Gadag district, Karnataka
Original Sanctuary Area 244.15 square kilometres declared in 2019
Actual Reserve Forest Area Approximately 288 square kilometres
Area to be Added Around 55 square kilometres
Key Authority Karnataka State Wildlife Board
Governing Law Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972
Related Concept Eco-Sensitive Zones around protected areas
Court Bench Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha
Conservation Objective Protection of biodiversity and reserve forest ecosystems
Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctuary Expansion Ordered by Karnataka High Court
  1. Karnataka High Court ordered expansion of Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctuary in Gadag district.
  2. The court directed the government to include remaining portions of Kappatagudda Reserve Forest within the sanctuary boundary.
  3. The existing sanctuary notification covered 15 square kilometres declared in May 2019.
  4. Karnataka State Wildlife Board earlier recommended protecting a much larger forest area.
  5. The reserve forest area of Kappatagudda measures approximately 288 square kilometres.
  6. The High Court observed reducing sanctuary size without justification was arbitrary.
  7. The directive was issued by a bench led by Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru.
  8. Justice C.M. Poonacha was also part of the Division Bench delivering the judgement.
  9. India currently has more than 570 wildlife sanctuaries forming protected biodiversity networks.
  10. The ruling dismissed petitions from stone crushing industries operating near reserve forest areas.
  11. Petitioners requested reducing sanctuary boundary to 178 square kilometres proposed in 2017 plan.
  12. The court stated environmental protection must take precedence over commercial interests.
  13. Authorities were directed to issue a fresh notification correcting the sanctuary boundaries.
  14. The revised notification must include remaining 55 square kilometres earlier excluded from protection.
  15. Sanctuary boundaries must align with recommendations of Karnataka State Wildlife Board.
  16. Wildlife Protection Act 1972 governs declaration of wildlife sanctuaries in India.
  17. The case highlighted the importance of Eco-Sensitive Zones surrounding protected areas.
  18. Eco-Sensitive Zones regulate activities such as mining, stone crushing, and industrial operations.
  19. These zones help reduce human pressure on fragile wildlife ecosystems.
  20. The ruling strengthens biodiversity conservation efforts in Karnataka Deccan plateau region.

Q1. The Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctuary is located in which district of Karnataka?


Q2. Which court directed the Karnataka government to expand the Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctuary boundary?


Q3. What was the area originally notified as Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctuary in 2019?


Q4. Which law provides the legal framework for declaring wildlife sanctuaries in India?


Q5. Eco-Sensitive Zones around protected areas mainly aim to:


Your Score: 0

Current Affairs PDF March 10

Descriptive CA PDF

One-Liner CA PDF

MCQ CA PDF​

CA PDF Tamil

Descriptive CA PDF Tamil

One-Liner CA PDF Tamil

MCQ CA PDF Tamil

CA PDF Hindi

Descriptive CA PDF Hindi

One-Liner CA PDF Hindi

MCQ CA PDF Hindi

News of the Day

Premium

National Tribal Health Conclave 2025: Advancing Inclusive Healthcare for Tribal India
New Client Special Offer

20% Off

Aenean leo ligulaconsequat vitae, eleifend acer neque sed ipsum. Nam quam nunc, blandit vel, tempus.