UIDAI Rejects Fingerprint Matching of Deceased with Aadhaar: Privacy Over Policing

CURRENT AFFAIRS: UIDAI Aadhaar Privacy Ruling, Aadhaar Act 2016 Sections 29 & 33, Biometric Data Confidentiality, Unknown Body Identification India, Supreme Court UIDAI Hearing, UIDAI and Police Demands, Biometric Sharing Restrictions, Aadhaar Fingerprint Rules, Demographic Data Disclosure India

UIDAI Rejects Fingerprint Matching of Deceased with Aadhaar: Privacy Over Policing

No Fingerprint Match with Aadhaar for Deceased, Says UIDAI

UIDAI Rejects Fingerprint Matching of Deceased with Aadhaar: Privacy Over Policing: The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) has clarified that it cannot provide fingerprint matching or demographic details from the Aadhaar database to help the police identify unclaimed or unknown deceased bodies. This decision reinforces the strict data privacy norms laid down under the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016. Even in cases where identity is critical for law enforcement, data confidentiality takes precedence.

What the Aadhaar Act Says About Biometric Privacy

The Aadhaar Act, 2016, was enacted to ensure targeted delivery of government subsidies and services. It includes Chapter VI, which deals with the confidentiality and security of identity information. Section 29(1) of the Act specifically prohibits sharing of core biometric data—such as fingerprints or iris scans—for any reason whatsoever, even with government agencies. This means that even if police request such data for identifying a body, UIDAI is not legally permitted to comply.

Legal Path Only Through Courts—and Even Then, Limited

There is a narrow exception in Section 33(1) of the Act. It allows for the disclosure of identity information or authentication records, but only when ordered by the High Court or Supreme Court. Even in such cases, the UIDAI must be heard in court, and core biometric data cannot be disclosed, only basic demographic or authentication logs. This clause ensures judicial oversight in any attempt to override privacy protections.

Striking a Balance: Public Safety vs Data Protection

While the inability to use Aadhaar to identify unknown bodies might pose challenges for criminal investigations or disaster responses, the law clearly prioritizes citizen privacy and misuse prevention. The UIDAI’s refusal isn’t a technical limitation—it is a legal mandate meant to uphold data security, personal dignity, and the original purpose of Aadhaar.

Static GK Snapshot

Topic Detail
Governing Body Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI)
Relevant Law Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies) Act, 2016
Section Prohibiting Sharing Section 29(1) – No sharing of core biometric data
Section Allowing Limited Disclosure Section 33(1) – Only through court order, excludes biometric data
Core Biometric Data Includes Fingerprints, iris scans
Original Purpose of Aadhaar Targeted delivery of subsidies and services
Disclosure Requirement Must be approved by High Court/Supreme Court with UIDAI’s presence
UIDAI Rejects Fingerprint Matching of Deceased with Aadhaar: Privacy Over Policing
  1. UIDAI has refused to share fingerprint data from Aadhaar for identifying deceased persons.
  2. The denial is based on the Aadhaar Act, 2016, which prioritizes data privacy over policing.
  3. Section 29(1) of the Aadhaar Act prohibits sharing of core biometric data, including fingerprints and iris scans.
  4. Even police cannot access biometric data from Aadhaar to identify unclaimed or unknown bodies.
  5. Section 33(1) of the Act allows limited disclosure only through court orders by the High Court or Supreme Court.
  6. UIDAI must be present in court hearings where data disclosure is considered under Section 33.
  7. Even under court orders, only demographic data or authentication logs can be shared—not biometrics.
  8. Core biometric data refers specifically to fingerprints and iris scans, as defined in the Aadhaar Act.
  9. The Aadhaar database was designed for delivery of subsidies and benefits, not for law enforcement use.
  10. UIDAI’s rejection is a legal mandate, not a technical limitation.
  11. The clarification strengthens individual privacy protections under Indian digital identity law.
  12. Unknown body identification by police cannot rely on Aadhaar biometric matching.
  13. The Supreme Court has earlier upheld limited access to Aadhaar data in the interest of privacy rights.
  14. The case underscores a balance between public safety and constitutional privacy protections.
  15. Biometric sharing restrictions are central to preventing misuse and unauthorized surveillance.
  16. The Aadhaar Act ensures judicial oversight before any identity data is disclosed.
  17. Demographic data, such as name and address, may be disclosed under strict legal conditions.
  18. The UIDAI was established under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology.
  19. Section 29 bars even government agencies from accessing biometric data.
  20. The UIDAI’s stance reinforces that Aadhaar is not a policing tool, but a welfare delivery mechanism.

Q1. What is the main reason UIDAI refuses to share fingerprint data of deceased individuals for identification purposes?


Q2. According to the Aadhaar Act, 2016, which section strictly prohibits the sharing of core biometric data under any circumstances?


Q3. Under which section of the Aadhaar Act can limited identity information be disclosed through a court order, excluding biometric data?


Q4. Which of the following is considered core biometric data under the Aadhaar Act, 2016?


Q5. What is the original purpose of the Aadhaar scheme as per the UIDAI and Aadhaar Act?


Your Score: 0

Daily Current Affairs May 25

Descriptive CA PDF

One-Liner CA PDF

MCQ CA PDF​

CA PDF Tamil

Descriptive CA PDF Tamil

One-Liner CA PDF Tamil

MCQ CA PDF Tamil

CA PDF Hindi

Descriptive CA PDF Hindi

One-Liner CA PDF Hindi

MCQ CA PDF Hindi

News of the Day

Premium

National Tribal Health Conclave 2025: Advancing Inclusive Healthcare for Tribal India
New Client Special Offer

20% Off

Aenean leo ligulaconsequat vitae, eleifend acer neque sed ipsum. Nam quam nunc, blandit vel, tempus.